Menu

colleen

0 ITEMS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 replies - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: which one is my ‘ect sensor sending unit’? #569701
    colleencolleen
    Participant

      hooray, my dash temp gauge works! that’s good news, didn’t want to replace the gauge cluster. this single wire comes straight out from where its connected, I held the plastic connector with a pair of pliers, and took a small pry bar leveraged in between the plastic connector and the metal sending unit assembly and just popped the unit out. I’m glad I didn’t try to pry open the plastic connector.

      i cut the end off a low voltage test lead, stripped about an inch of plastic casing off the cut end, twisted the exposed end and doubled it over, and shoved that into the plastic connector. clipped the alligator clip on the other end of the lead to a bolt head on the cylinder block. then I put the ignition to on, and the needle went straight to hot in less than a half second. you’re not supposed to let it reach the hot mark, it could damage the gauge, but oh well.

      now I know the gauge works, the manuals say to test the resistance of the sending unit itself.

      here’s the procedure if you don’t have a manual:
      *with engine cold, use an ohmmeter to measure resistance between the positive terminal and the engine (ground)
      *check the temperature of the coolant
      *run the engine and measure the change in resistance with the engine at operating temperature (radiator fan comes on)
      *if obtained readings are substantially different from spec, replace the sending unit

      specs:
      temp 56c(133f), resistance 142
      temp 85c(185f)-100c(212f), resistance 49-32(ohms)

      now I am a rookie (obviously! ha ha) and I can’t see how if your sending unit passes the resistance test what else you would check after that. anyway, I’m going to go ahead and do that but I can’t run my car right now cuz some fuel components are disconnected so its gonna have to wait. will be using my harbor freight cheapie multimeter that I got for FREE with a coupon there so hope its up to the task.

      EDIT:
      well, for the first time since owning this car, I’m getting a response from the dash temp gauge while the car is running. After replacing my thermostat, coolant temp switch, and ‘shocking’ the ect sending unit back to life, not sure which one did it, it works. Never went as far as measuring resistance on the unit itself. After peeling back the rubber on the connector (unnecessarily), I had to rig something to cover the wires again so I took an inch of plastic tubing, the pre-cut kind designed to wrap around wires, put that over the plastic connector, gave it a few wraps w/ electrical tape, and am currently hoping the tape doesn’t melt. Actually have duct tape over some air box fittings which disintegrated when I pulled the air box out to work on the thermostat, too. don’t laugh.

      in reply to: impact wrench vs impact driver? #576202
      colleencolleen
      Participant

        thanks for the responses to this post. I can see I was a bit uninformed when starting this thread, and need to look around in the impact wrench selection since I wont be driving screws.

        the 1/2 in drives with minimum 18v cordless units look to be the way to go on these types of wrenches. I am interested in this dewalt 18v mainly for the price, (20% off till end of month), the 2 batteries included, the smaller size (being a woman, I have small hands), and the variable speed. one reviewer did state he had to hold the wrench on his lug nuts for a bit to release them.

        one more question – the specs for this wrench state 1740 in/lbs. of turning force. Do I divide this number by 12 to get total ft/lbs of torque this is capable of? for example, 1740/12=145. 145 is the maximum ft/lbs of torque I can achieve, and that number should be the same on forward & reverse settings (I assume). so I SHOULD be able to either pull a nut/bolt that is set to 145 ft/lbs or drive a nut/bolt to 145 ft/lbs. is this correct?

        http://www.homedepot.com/p/DEWALT-18-Volt-XRP-Ni-Cad-1-2-in-13mm-Cordless-Impact-Wrench-Kit-DC820KA/202512394?MERCH=REC-_-product-3-_-202196560-_-202512394-_-N#customer_reviews

        so if I want to set my lug nuts to 80 ft/lbs, this should be no problem. its just slightly concerning that someone had to hold it on their lug nuts for a bit. unless their lugnuts were set to around this wrenches max capability, (145 ft/lbs), which I find unlikely, they were probably set to max 100 ft/lbs, if overtorqued. so that’s my only doubt about this, I’m not convinced of the ft/lb spec as stated. I may have to keep shopping, I haven’t decided yet.

        thanks again for opinions.

        in reply to: impact wrench vs impact driver? #569680
        colleencolleen
        Participant

          thanks for the responses to this post. I can see I was a bit uninformed when starting this thread, and need to look around in the impact wrench selection since I wont be driving screws.

          the 1/2 in drives with minimum 18v cordless units look to be the way to go on these types of wrenches. I am interested in this dewalt 18v mainly for the price, (20% off till end of month), the 2 batteries included, the smaller size (being a woman, I have small hands), and the variable speed. one reviewer did state he had to hold the wrench on his lug nuts for a bit to release them.

          one more question – the specs for this wrench state 1740 in/lbs. of turning force. Do I divide this number by 12 to get total ft/lbs of torque this is capable of? for example, 1740/12=145. 145 is the maximum ft/lbs of torque I can achieve, and that number should be the same on forward & reverse settings (I assume). so I SHOULD be able to either pull a nut/bolt that is set to 145 ft/lbs or drive a nut/bolt to 145 ft/lbs. is this correct?

          http://www.homedepot.com/p/DEWALT-18-Volt-XRP-Ni-Cad-1-2-in-13mm-Cordless-Impact-Wrench-Kit-DC820KA/202512394?MERCH=REC-_-product-3-_-202196560-_-202512394-_-N#customer_reviews

          so if I want to set my lug nuts to 80 ft/lbs, this should be no problem. its just slightly concerning that someone had to hold it on their lug nuts for a bit. unless their lugnuts were set to around this wrenches max capability, (145 ft/lbs), which I find unlikely, they were probably set to max 100 ft/lbs, if overtorqued. so that’s my only doubt about this, I’m not convinced of the ft/lb spec as stated. I may have to keep shopping, I haven’t decided yet.

          thanks again for opinions.

          in reply to: which one is my ‘ect sensor sending unit’? #576118
          colleencolleen
          Participant

            no, I haven’t got that far 🙁 I need to disconnect the plastic connector (I assume) and don’t know how. I’ve never seen a connector like this before. it looks like I could pop one end up, but I don’t want to break the connector. I don’t know how else I would access the terminal point of the wire itself w/out opening this connector.

            in reply to: which one is my ‘ect sensor sending unit’? #569596
            colleencolleen
            Participant

              no, I haven’t got that far 🙁 I need to disconnect the plastic connector (I assume) and don’t know how. I’ve never seen a connector like this before. it looks like I could pop one end up, but I don’t want to break the connector. I don’t know how else I would access the terminal point of the wire itself w/out opening this connector.

              in reply to: which one is my ‘ect sensor sending unit’? #576112
              colleencolleen
              Participant

                here’s another pic, I ended up peeling back the rubber cover on the wire to expose this clear plastic connector. now stumped as to how to unlatch it w/out breaking it.

                Attachments:
                in reply to: which one is my ‘ect sensor sending unit’? #569584
                colleencolleen
                Participant

                  here’s another pic, I ended up peeling back the rubber cover on the wire to expose this clear plastic connector. now stumped as to how to unlatch it w/out breaking it.

                  Attachments:
                  in reply to: which one is my ‘ect sensor sending unit’? #575716
                  colleencolleen
                  Participant

                    96 accord 4cyl vtec m/trans

                    ok my bad. the Chilton doesn’t say to disconnect the cap. it says:

                    ‘with the ignition switch off, disconnect the wire from the ect gauge sending unit, then ground it to a place on the engine block or other known good ground with a jumper wire. ‘

                    after then turning ignition switch to on, the gauge should move toward hot in a smooth manner. book adds to turn ignition switch OFF before gauge reaches hot or could damage gauge.

                    this does appear to be a method of testing the GAUGE itself. now another question, would this test basically condemn the sending unit if the needle smoothly rolls to hot? (and the dash gauge is not working under normal operation. I know this is a simplification considering there are probably other factors involved, like thermostat).

                    so yes that makes more sense now that you say it is a single wire. In between the two ‘sensors’ that I thought may be the ect sending unit is a single green/yellow wire connected directly to the cylinder block. you can see it in the previous pictures, in the middle. the old foam boot covering it will probably not deal well with tampering so instead of messing with it right now I will wait for confirmation that this is my wire.

                    here’s another pic:

                    Attachments:
                    in reply to: which one is my ‘ect sensor sending unit’? #569183
                    colleencolleen
                    Participant

                      96 accord 4cyl vtec m/trans

                      ok my bad. the Chilton doesn’t say to disconnect the cap. it says:

                      ‘with the ignition switch off, disconnect the wire from the ect gauge sending unit, then ground it to a place on the engine block or other known good ground with a jumper wire. ‘

                      after then turning ignition switch to on, the gauge should move toward hot in a smooth manner. book adds to turn ignition switch OFF before gauge reaches hot or could damage gauge.

                      this does appear to be a method of testing the GAUGE itself. now another question, would this test basically condemn the sending unit if the needle smoothly rolls to hot? (and the dash gauge is not working under normal operation. I know this is a simplification considering there are probably other factors involved, like thermostat).

                      so yes that makes more sense now that you say it is a single wire. In between the two ‘sensors’ that I thought may be the ect sending unit is a single green/yellow wire connected directly to the cylinder block. you can see it in the previous pictures, in the middle. the old foam boot covering it will probably not deal well with tampering so instead of messing with it right now I will wait for confirmation that this is my wire.

                      here’s another pic:

                      Attachments:
                      in reply to: what is this box on top of my transmission? #574922
                      colleencolleen
                      Participant

                        wow thanks for the input! this is the coolest website ever. apparently this box is called a ‘shift arm cover’ according to this picture on the majestic Honda site.

                        http://www.hondaautomotiveparts.com/auto/jsp/mws/prddisplay.jsp?inputstate=5&catcgry1=ACCORD&catcgry2=1996&catcgry3=4DR+EX&catcgry4=KL5MT&catcgry5=MT+TRANSMISSION+HOUSING

                        doesn’t really clarify the situation too much, tho. the oil leak seems to be isolated to this unit. I’m a noob, but I would think that with a distributor o-ring or valve cover leak, I would also be seeing oil on the distributor or around the valve cover, which I’m not. I don’t know. honestly I have bigger fish to fry right now as I was trying to diagnose my cooling fans not engaging and noticed my condenser fan relays which are mounted to the side of the radiator seemed to be sooty around the wires, so pulled them off, and obviously need to replace both the relays and the male fitting connectors which attach to the wires so not really sure how to go about doing that. so I’m about to put ‘fried relays’ into the search box here. good times 🙂

                        in reply to: what is this box on top of my transmission? #568463
                        colleencolleen
                        Participant

                          wow thanks for the input! this is the coolest website ever. apparently this box is called a ‘shift arm cover’ according to this picture on the majestic Honda site.

                          http://www.hondaautomotiveparts.com/auto/jsp/mws/prddisplay.jsp?inputstate=5&catcgry1=ACCORD&catcgry2=1996&catcgry3=4DR+EX&catcgry4=KL5MT&catcgry5=MT+TRANSMISSION+HOUSING

                          doesn’t really clarify the situation too much, tho. the oil leak seems to be isolated to this unit. I’m a noob, but I would think that with a distributor o-ring or valve cover leak, I would also be seeing oil on the distributor or around the valve cover, which I’m not. I don’t know. honestly I have bigger fish to fry right now as I was trying to diagnose my cooling fans not engaging and noticed my condenser fan relays which are mounted to the side of the radiator seemed to be sooty around the wires, so pulled them off, and obviously need to replace both the relays and the male fitting connectors which attach to the wires so not really sure how to go about doing that. so I’m about to put ‘fried relays’ into the search box here. good times 🙂

                        Viewing 11 replies - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
                        Loading…